Examination of buildings with different number of floors using non-linear time history analysis according to TBEC-2018 and EC 8 seismic codes
Main Article Content
Abstract
Earthquakes are among the natural disasters that occur on earth and cause loss of life and property. As a result of the earthquakes that have occurred on the earth from the past to the present, the issue of earthquake performance of structures has come to the fore in structural and earthquake engineering. Within the scope of this research, the carrier system; Consisting of a unhollow reinforced concrete shear wall frame system with high ductility having the same floor formwork plan; The seismic performance evaluation of 10, 15 and 20 storey existing reinforced concrete buildings was made by using nonlinear time history analysis according to Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018 (TBEC-2018) and Eurocode 8 (EC 8) earthquake codes. Within the scope of the study, SAP200 (v25) computer software was used for modelling of the structures and performance analysis. In scope of the data obtained, it has been determined that TBEC-2018 is on the safer side compared to Eurocode 8.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Özmen, B., & Nurlu, M. (1999). Deprem bölgeleri haritası ile ilgili bazı bilgiler. TMMOB Jeoloji Mühendisleri Odası Haber Bülteni, 99, 32-35.
GEM TEAM. (2009). Global Earthquake Model (GEM). https://www.globalquakemodel.org/
AFAD. (2018). Türkiye’de afet yönetimi ve doğa kaynaklı afet istatistikleri. https://www.afad.gov.tr/kurumlar/afad.gov.tr/35429/xfiles/turkiye_de_afetler.pdf
Dilmaç, H., Ulutaş, H., Tekeli, H., & Demir, F. (2018). An evaluation on seismic performance of existing reinforced concrete buildings in Turkey. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(Ek-1), 224-237. https://doi.org/10.29048/makufebed.443126
Çeltik, B., & Can, H. (2022). Comparison of performance evaluation of an existing reinforced concrete structure and post-retrofitting analysis results with linear and non-linear calculation methods. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 5, 100-102.
Özkaynak, Ş. (2021). Türkiye’de gerçekleşen büyük depremler. TRT HABER. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/turkiye/turkiyede-gerceklesen-buyuk-depremler-561205.html
Dünya Haber. (2023). Kahramanmaraş depremi son yüzyılın en büyük ikinci depremi. https://www.dunya.com/gundem/kahramanmaras-depremi-son-yuzyilin-en-buyuk-ikinci-depremi-haberi-685159
Knoll, T., & Knoll, J. (1990). Photoshop (25.3.1). Adobe Systems. https://www.adobe.com/tr/products/photoshop/landpa.html?skwcid=AL!3085!3!340872550298!e!!g!!photoshop&s_kwcid=AL!3085!3!340872550298!e!!g!!photoshop&ef_id=EAIaIQobChMIwJvdp9ecgwMV_5eDBx2PrwhSEAAYASAAEgLQXvD_BwE:G:s
Konak, A. (2022). Nonlinear performance assessment of rc buildings based on displacement design by implementing tsc2018 with comparison to the Eurocode. [Master’s Thesis, Dicle University].
Karakaş, Ç. Ç. (2022). Mevcut binaların Türkiye bina deprem yönetmelikleri ve Eurocode 8'e göre hasar görebilirliklerinin irdelenmesi. [Doctoral Dissertation, Pamukkale University].
Buzuku, J. (2019). Seismic performance evaluation of 24 story RC building by nonlinear time history analysis utilizing TBDY2018 and EC8. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
Severcan, M. H., & Sinani, B. (2019). Mevcut betonarme yapilarin deprem performansinin analizi. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 936-947. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.598151
Kazancı, S. (2018). Türkiye Deprem Yönetmeliği 2007 ve Eurocode 8'e göre tasarlanan betonarme binalarda doğrusal analiz yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Gelişim University].
Işıltan, Ö. (2010). Betonarme kolonlar için DBYBHY 2007, Eurocode 8 ve FEMA 356 ile yapılan performans değerlendirmelerinin deney sonuçlarıyla karşılaştırılması. [Master’s Thesis, Istanbul Technical University].
Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) (1196). https://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
AFAD. (2020). TADAS (Türkiye İvme Veri Tabanı ve Analiz Sistemi). T.C İç İşleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. https://tadas.afad.gov.tr
T.C. İçişleri Bakanlığı, & Başkanlığı, A. ve A. D. Y. (2018). Türkiye bina deprem yönetmeliği. Resmi Gazete. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=24468&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5
European Commission. (2004). EN 1998-1:2004 Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: General rules, seismic actions, and rules for buildings. Joint Research Center. https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EN-Eurocodes/eurocode-8-design-structures-earthquake-resistance
Seismosoft. (2023). SeismoMatch (v2023). https://seismosoft.com/
SAP2000. (2000). Structural analysis and design (v25.1.0). Computers and Structures, Inc. https://www.csiamerica.com/products/sap2000
AFAD. (2019). Türkiye deprem tehlike haritası. T.C İç İşleri Bakanlığı Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. https://www.afad.gov.tr/turkiye-deprem-tehlike-haritasi
Yılmaz, M., & Can, H. (2023). Examination of buildings with different number of floors using non-linear time history analysis according to TBEC-2018 and EC 8 seismic codes. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 8, 49-51.