Numerical data generation using unmanned aerial vehicle: a case study of Aksaray Güzelyurt District

Main Article Content

Efdal Kaya
Müjdet Güngör

Abstract

Base maps can be produced using terrestrial methods, also known as classical methods. In recent years, with the technological developments, remote sensing methods have been started to be used in the production of base maps. These methods are satellite images, LIDAR systems and aerial photogrammetry. Although these systems are innovative systems brought by technology, they have their own advantages and disadvantages. The presence of atmospheric-radiometric errors in photographing satellite images and the correction of these errors in these satellite images increase the cost. Although LIDAR systems can produce dense point cloud data representing the land topography and are an active sensing system that is not dependent on weather conditions, they are still quite burdensome in terms of cost. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) have started to be used in many areas due to their low cost and decreasing size. Especially in recent years, UAVs have started to be used for technical data production. These technical data in the field of geomatics can be used in orthophoto map production, in the production of ready-made maps to scale, digital terrain model (DTM), digital elevation model (DEM), route creation in road projects, excavation-fill calculations, area-volume calculations and observation of environmental change. The aim of this study is to produce a base map using up-to-date technological equipment and methods. Güzelyurt District, an area of approximately 110 hectares in Aksaray Province, was chosen as the application area. The eBee Rtk model was used for taking terrain photographs. Sony camera is mounted on the UAV. The 166 field pictures were taken from a height of 150 meters, with a transverse overlap of 70% and a longitudinal overlap of 80%. These pictures were evaluated in the Pix4D program. As a result of the evaluation, orthophoto map, DEM and point cloud data were obtained.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaya, E., & Güngör, M. (2022). Numerical data generation using unmanned aerial vehicle: a case study of Aksaray Güzelyurt District. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 34–39. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/uav/article/view/154
Section
Articles

References

Ersoy, N. (2019). GPS Yöntemi ile Halihazır Harita Üretimi.

Döner, F., Özdemir, S., & Ceylan, M. (2014). İnsansız Hava Aracı Sistemlerinin Veri Toplama ve Haritalama Çalışmalarında Kullanımı.

Eisenbeiss, H. (2004). A mini unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV): system overview and image acquisition. International Archives of Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 36(5/W1), 1-7.

Comert, R., Avdan, U., & Şenkal, E. (2012). İnsansız hava araçlarının kullanım alanları ve gelecekteki beklentiler.

Yakar, M. (2011). Using close range photogrammetry to measure the position of inaccessible geological features. Experimental Techniques, 35(1), 54-59.

Yılmaz H. M., Karabörk H. & Yakar M. (2000). Yersel fotogrametrinin kullanım alanları, Niğde Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 4, 18-28.

Alptekin, A., Çelik, M. Ö., Doğan, Y., & Yakar, M. (2019). Mapping of a rockfall site with an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 1(1), 12-16.

Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2020). Heyelan bölgesinin İHA kullanarak modellenmesi. Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi, 2(1), 17-21.

Kusak, L., Unel, F. B., Alptekin, A., Celik, M. O., & Yakar, M. (2021). Apriori association rule and K-means clustering algorithms for interpretation of pre-event landslide areas and landslide inventory mapping. Open Geosciences, 13(1), 1226-1244.

Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2020). Determination of pond volume with using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 2(2), 59-63.

Ünel, F. B., Kuşak, L., Çelik, M. Ö., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2020). Kıyı çizgisinin belirlenerek mülkiyet durumunun incelenmesi. Türkiye Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, 2(1), 33-40.

Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). 3D model of Üçayak Ruins obtained from point clouds. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(2), 37-40.

Kaya, Y., Yiğit, A. Y., Ulvi, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Arkeolojik alanların dokümantasyonununda fotogrametrik tekniklerinin doğruluklarının karşılaştırmalı analizi: Konya Yunuslar Örneği. Harita Dergisi, 87(165), 57-72.

Mirdan, O., & Yakar, M. (2017). Tarihi eserlerin insansız hava aracı ile modellenmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Geomatik, 2(3), 118-125.

Şasi, A., & Yakar, M. (2017). Photogrammetric modelling of Sakahane Masjid using an unmanned aerial vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1(2), 82-87.

Yakar, M., & Doğan, Y. (2017). Silifke Aşağı Dünya Obruğu’nun İHA kullanılarak üç boyutlu modellenmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 17(4), 94-101.

Öztürk, M. Y. & Çölkesen, İ. (2021). The impacts of vegetation indices from UAV-based RGB imagery on land cover classification using ensemble learning. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3 (2), 41-47.

Karabacak, A. (2021). İnsansız hava araçları (İHA) İle enerji nakil hatlarının ölçülmesi üzerine derleme. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3 (1), 1-8. DOI: 10.53030/tufod.897992

Ceylan, M. C. & Uysal, M. (2021). İnsansız hava aracı ile elde edilen veriler yardımıyla ağaç çıkarımı. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3 (1), 15-21.