A systematic method for post-earthquake damage assessment: Case study of the Antep Castle, Türkiye

Main Article Content

Lale Karataş
Tahir Ateş
Aydın Alptekin
Murat Dal
Murat Yakar

Abstract

Although there is no definite information about when and by whom Antep Castle was built, its history dates back 6000 years. The walls of the Antep castle were built in the Byzantine Period in the 6th century AD, and it is the most important structure of Gaziantep with its historical monument value and its significant contribution to the National Struggle in history. The castle was used during the occupation of Antep, and today it has the Heroism and Panorama Museum, which tells about the events that took place during the national struggle. In the earthquakes that took place on February 6, 2023, with an interval of 9 hours, the massive damage to the Antep Castle and its walls caused the castle to become the symbol of the earthquake in Turkey. In order to ensure the sustainability of our cultural heritage, there is a need for a detailed and systematic assessment of the damage assessment of Antep Castle and walls after the earthquake. The main purpose of this study is to discuss the damage observed after the earthquake in the historical Antep Castle and its walls in Gaziantep, Turkey. In the study, literature research, on-site visual examination and tabulation methods were applied. Based on the problems seen in the post-earthquake fortifications in different countries in the world, a table of damage mechanisms was created that can be used as a tool to classify post-earthquake damages on the walls on a geographical basis. The method presented in this study will save a great deal of time, money and effort in the evaluation and rehabilitation of fortifications with cultural and strategic historical importance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Karataş , L. ., Ateş, T. ., Alptekin, A., Dal, M. ., & Yakar, M. (2023). A systematic method for post-earthquake damage assessment: Case study of the Antep Castle, Türkiye . Advanced Engineering Science, 3, 62–71. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/ades/article/view/859
Section
Articles

References

AFAD (2023). 06 Şubat 2023 PAZARCIK (KAHRAMANMARAŞ) MW 7.7 ELBİSTAN (KAHRAMANMARAŞ) MW 7.6 DEPREMLERİNE İLİŞKİN ÖN DEĞERLENDİRME RAPORU. DEPREM DAİRESİ BAŞKANLIĞI

T. C. The Ministry of Culture and Tourism General Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums (2023). Depremden Etkilenen İllerimizde Bulunan Müzelerimiz ve Dünya Miras Alanlarımıza İlişkin 9.2.2023 Tarihli Açıklama

Tiberti, S., Acito, M., & Milani, G. (2016). Comprehensive FE numerical insight into Finale Emilia Castle behavior under 2012 Emilia Romagna seismic sequence: Damage causes and seismic vulnerability mitigation hypothesis. Engineering Structures, 117, 397-421.

Castellazzi, G., D’Altri, A. M., Bitelli, G., Selvaggi, I., & Lambertini, A. (2015). From laser scanning to finite element analysis of complex buildings by using a semi-automatic procedure. Sensors, 15(8), 18360-18380.

Coïsson, E., Ferrari, L., Ferretti, D., & Rozzi, M. (2016). Non-smooth dynamic analysis of local seismic damage mechanisms of the San Felice Fortress in Northern Italy. Procedia Engineering, 161, 451-457.

Meschini, A., Leoni, G., Petrucci, E., Sicuranza, F., Zona, A., Piattoni, Q., ... & Dall'Asta, A. (2015, September). An integrated survey experience for assessing the seismic vulnerability of Senigallia's Fortress (Italy): documentation for conservation and FEM modeling. In 2015 Digital Heritage (Vol. 2, pp. 21-28). IEEE.

Barrile, V., Bilotta, G., D’Amore, E., Meduri, G. M., & Trovato, S. (2016). Structural modeling of a historic castle using close range photogrammetry. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 10, 370-380.

Leoni, G., Zona, A., Piattoni, Q., Meschini, A., Petrucci, E., Dall’Asta, A., & Dezi, L. (2015). Assessment of seismic vulnerability of historical defensive walls. In 5th ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering COMPDYN.

Cattari, S., Degli Abbati, S., Ferretti, D., Lagomarsino, S., Ottonelli, D., & Tralli, A. (2014). Damage assessment of fortresses after the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy). Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 12, 2333-2365.

Coïsson, E., Ferretti, D., & Lenticchia, E. (2016). Italian castles and earthquakes: A GIS for knowledge and preservation. In Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions: Anamnesis, diagnosis, therapy, controls (pp. 1489-1496). CRC Press.

Yüce, B. (2010). Osmanlı Son Dönemi ile Erken Cumhuriyet Dönemi Arasında Gaziantep’te Mimari Dokunun Değişimi (1839-1950) (Doctoral dissertation, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

Şiraz, B. E. (2005). Gaziantep Hamamları. (Master’s Thesis, Z.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü )

Bulut, E., & Şimşek, M. Y. (2014). Kırsal Turizm ve Gaziantep Arkeolojik Değerleri. Türk Bilimsel Derlemeler Dergisi, (2), 38-44.

Coïsson, E., Ferretti, D., & Lenticchia, E. (2017). Analysis of damage mechanisms suffered by Italian fortified buildings hit by earthquakes in the last 40 years. Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 15, 5139-5166.

Yardımlı, S., Dal, M., & Mıhlayanlar, E. (2018). Investigation of Earthquake Behaviour of Construction System and Materials in Traditional Turkish Architecture. In ITM Web of Conferences (Vol. 22, p. 01034). EDP Sciences.

Dal, M., & Ayhan, E. (2020). Depreme Dayanıklı Yapı Tasarımı / Betonarme Yapılarda Görülen Düzensizlik Uygulamaları. Geçmişten Geleceğe Mimarlıkta Malzeme ve Yapı Fiziği, Gecekitaplığı Yayınevi, 217-238.

Karataş, L. (2022). Mardin’de Kültürel Miras Yapılarında Restorasyon Sırasında Yapılan Hatalı Onarımlar, Restorasyon Sonrası Süreçte Karşılaşılan Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Kültürel Miras Araştırmaları, 3(2), 78-86.

Karataş, L. (2023). Investigating the historical building materials with spectroscopic and geophysical methods: A case study of Mardin Castle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7(3), 266-278.

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., Kanun, E., & Yakar, M. (2022). Tarihi kârgir yapılarda taş malzeme bozulmalarının İHA fotogrametrisi kullanarak tespiti ve belgelenmesi: Mersin Kanlıdivane ören yeri vaka çalışması. İçel Dergisi, 2(2), 41-49.

Kanun, E., Alptekin, A., Karataş, L., & Yakar, M. (2022). The use of UAV photogrammetry in modeling ancient structures: A case study of “Kanytellis”. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 41-50.

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 54-63.

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Determination of Stone Material Deteriorations on the Facades with the Combination of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Methods: Case Study of Historical Burdur Station Premises. Advanced Geomatics, 2(2), 65-72.

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Analytical Documentation of Stone Material Deteriorations on Facades with Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Methods: Case Study of Şanlıurfa Kışla Mosque. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 36-47.

Karataş, L., & Menteşe, D. H. (2022). Dara Antik Kenti (Anastasiopolis) Nekropol Alanının Malzeme Sorunlarının Yersel Lazer Tarama Yönteminden Elde Edilen Ortofotolar Yardımıyla Belgelenmesi. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 4(2), 41-50.

Karataş, L., & Alptekin, A. (2022). Kagir Yapılardaki Taş Malzeme Bozulmalarının Lidar Tarama Yöntemi ile Belgelenmesi: Geleneksel Silvan Konağı Vaka Çalışması. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 4(2), 71-84.

Karataş, L. (2023). Yersel lazer tarama yöntemi ve ortofotoların kullanımı ile kültür varlıklarının cephelerindeki malzeme bozulmalarının dokümantasyonu: Mardin Mungan Konağı örneği. Geomatik, 8(2), 152-162

Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Material deteriorations occurring on the facades of the Mor Sergios Bakhos Church. Advanced Engineering Days (AED), 4, 48-51.