Investigation of Underwater Photogrammetry Method: Challenges and Photo Capturing Scenarios of the Method
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) documentation of an underwater object and its transfer to digital platforms have gained worldwide importance in recent years. For this purpose, the photogrammetry method has been tried underwater and the term underwater photogrammetry has found its place in the literature. The most important reason for preferring the photogrammetry method is that it collects data in a shorter time compared to other methods and provides a positive contribution in terms of time and cost. However, there are both environmental and physical limitations in the underwater photographic data collection process. Various suggestions have been made to minimize these restrictions. The method, in which three-dimensional (3D) data can be produced from moving records of objects known as Structure from Motion-SfM), is also used in underwater photogrammetry. In addition, software used in other photogrammetry methods can also be used in underwater photogrammetry. But in the applications made: According to the photographs taken by other photogrammetry methods, in the photographs taken under water; It is foreseen that some corrections such as color and contrast correction, shadow removal and highlight reduction should be applied with image processing before they can be evaluated in software. Like other photogrammetry methods, underwater photogrammetry has kept pace with technological developments.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agrafiotis, P., Skarlatos, D., Forbes, T., Poullis, C., Skamantzari, M. & Georgopoulos, A. (2018). “Underwater photogrammetry in very shallow waters: main challenges and caustics effect removal.” International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, pp.15-22.
Anelli, M., Julitta, T., Fallati, L., Galli, P., Rossini, M. & Colombo, R. (2019). “Towards new applications of underwater photogrammetry for investigating coral reef morphology and habitat complexity in the Myeik Archipelago, Myanmar.” Geocarto International, Vol. 34, No. 5, pp. 459-472.
Balletti, C., Beltrame, C., Costa, E., Guerra, F. & Vernier, P. (2015). “Underwater Photogrammetry and 3D Reconstruction of Marble Cargos Shipwreck.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 7-13.
Barnes, H. (1952). “Underwater television & marine biology.” American Scientist, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 679-681.
Bianco, G., Muzzupappa, M., Bruno, F., Garcia, R. & Neumann, L. (2015). “A new color correction method for underwater imaging.” The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 25.
Bryson, M., Johnson‐Roberson, M., Pizarro, O. & Williams, S. B. (2016). “True color correction of autonomous underwater vehicle imagery.” Journal of Field Robotics, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 853-874.
Burns, J. H. R. & Delparte, D. (2017). “Comparison of commercial structure-from-motion photogrammety software used for underwater three-dimensional modeling of coral reef environments.” The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, pp. 127-131.
Casella, E., Collin, A., Harris, D., Ferse, S., Bejarano, S., Parravicini, V. & Rovere, A. (2017). “Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques.” Coral Reefs, Vol. 36, No.1, pp. 269-275.
Cheng, H., Chu, J., Zhang, R., Tian, L. & Gui, X. (2020). “Turbid underwater polarization patterns considering multiple Mie scattering of suspended particles.” Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, Vol. 86, No. 12, pp. 737-743.
Döş, M. E. & Yiğit, A. Y. Tarihi minberlerin fotogrametri yöntemi ile belgelenmesi. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 4(2), 57-64.
Hamal, S. N. G. & Ulvi, A. Su Altı Fotogrametri Yöntemi ve Kullanım Alanı Üzerine Bir Literatür Araştırması. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(2), 60-71.
Hamal, S. N. G., Ulvi, A. & Yiğit, A. Y. (2021). Three-Dimensional Modeling of an Object Using Underwater Photogrammetry. Advanced Underwater Sciences, 1(1), 11-15.
Hamal, S. N. G., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y. & Yakar, M. (2022). Su Altı Yapılarının 3B Modellemesi ve Dokümantasyonunda Kullanılan Video ve Fotoğraf Çekimi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology, 12(4), 2262-2275.
Kahraman, B. B., Aşiret, G. D., Devrez, N., Özdemir, L. & Akdemir, N. (2012). Dalış Sporu ve Dalışlarda Yaşanan Sağlık Sorunlarının Önlenmesinde Hemşirenin Rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 73-81.
Kaya, F. Z., Akçay, Ö., Avşar, E. Ö. & Aydar, U. (2019). “Su altı fotogrametrik belgelemede güncel uygulamalar.”
Maas, H. G. (2015). “A modular geometric model for underwater photogrammetry.” The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 139.
Maas, H. G. (2015). “On the accuracy potential in underwater/multimedia photogrammetry.” Sensors, Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 18140-18152.
Mallet, D. & Pelletier, D. (2014). “Underwater video techniques for observing coastal marine biodiversity: a review of sixty years of publications (1952–2012).” Fisheries Research, Vol. 154, pp. 44-62.
Menna, F., Nocerino, E., Fassi, F. & Remondino, F. (2016). “Geometric and optic characterization of a hemispherical dome port for underwater photogrammetry.” Sensors, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 48.
Nocerino, E., Menna, F. & Grün, A. (2021). “Bundle adjustment with polynomial point-to-camera distance dependent corrections for underwater photogrammetry.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences-ISPRS Archives, Vol. 43, pp. 673-679.
Nocerino, E., Menna, F., Gruen, A., Troyer, M., Capra, A., Castagnetti, C. & Holbrook, S. J. (2020). “Coral reef monitoring by scuba divers using underwater photogrammetry and geodetic surveying.” Remote Sensing, Vol. 12, No. 18, pp.3036.
Oruç, M. E. (2021). Küçük objelerin modellenmesinde videogrametri ve fotogrametri yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması üzerine bir çalışma. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3(2), 62-68.
Oruç, M. E. (2021). The possibilities of data usage obtained from UAV. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 15-23.
Raoult, V., David, P. A., Dupont, S. F., Mathewson, C. P., O’Neill, S. J., Powell, N. N. & Williamson, J. E. (2016). “GoPros™ as an underwater photogrammetry tool for citizen science.” PeerJ, Vol. 4, pp. 1-18.
Şenol, H. İ., Yiğit, A. Y., Kaya, Y. & Ulvi, A., (2021). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik veri füzyonu ile kültürel mirasın 3 boyutlu (3B) modelleme uygulaması: Kanlıdivane Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 3(1), 29-36.
Ulvi, A. & Yiğit, A. Y. (2022). Comparison of the Wearable Mobile Laser Scanner (WMLS) with Other Point Cloud Data Collection Methods in Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Diokaisareia. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(4), 1-19.
Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Yiğit, A. Y. & Kaya, Y. (2020). İHA ve yersel fotogrametrik teknikler kullanarak Aksaray Kızıl Kilise’nin 3 Boyutlu nokta bulutu ve modelinin üretilmesi. Geomatik Dergisi, 5(1), 22-30.
URL-1: Infographic explaining the decompression sickness or divers disease. https://www.alamy.com/ [Accessed date: 15.03.2023]
Vlachos, M., Berger, L., Mathelier, R., Agrafiotis, P. & Skarlatos, D. (2019). “Software comparison for underwater archaeological photogrammetric applications.” International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences-ISPRS Archives.
Yakar, M., Kabadayı, A., Yiğit, A. Y., Çıkıkcı, K., Kaya, Y. & Catin, S. S. (2016). Emir Saltuk Kümbeti fotogrametrik rölöve çalişmasi ve 3boyutlu modellenmesi. Geomatik, 1(1), 14-18.
Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y. & Alptekin, A. (2022). Discontinuity set extraction from 3D point clouds obtained by UAV Photogrammetry in a rockfall site. Survey Review, 1-13.
Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y. & Hamal, S. N. G. (2022). İnsansız Hava Aracı Uygulamaları Agisoft-Metashape. Mersin Üniversitesi Harita Mühendisliği Kitapları.
Yiğit, A. Y. & Ulvi, A. (2020). İHA fotogrametrisi tekniği kullanarak 3B model oluşturma: Yakutiye Medresesi Örneği. Türkiye Fotogrametri Dergisi, 2(2), 46-54.
Yiğit, A. Y. & Uysal, M. (2021). Tarihi Eserlerin 3B Modellenmesi ve Artırılmış Gerçeklik ile Görselleştirilmesi. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 1032-1043.