The spatial evaluation of the real estates in the Konya- Hacıkaymak Neighborhood with the analytical hierarchy process method

Main Article Content


Real estate valuation is the appraisal of the real estate with an objective and impartial point of view, by evaluating many criteria related to the real estate, such as the characteristics of the real estate, the environment and the conditions of use. While valuing the immovable, it is necessary to consider all the criteria of the immovable and to determine the superiority of the criteria to each other in order to make the valuation qualified. Generally, in real estate valuation studies for residences, the spatial criteria of the real estate are ignored and are not considered important, but in fact, spatial characteristics also play an important role in determining the value of the real estate. In order to be able to evaluate spatially, it is necessary to determine and research the criteria effectively. In this study, the importance of spatial criteria in real estate valuation has been emphasized. It is aimed to make a spatial valuation of all residences located in Hacıkaymak Neighborhood in Selçuklu district of Konya province. 8 main criteria have been determined in order to make the evaluation in terms of location. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), which is the most widely used of the Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods, was used to determine the order of importance and weighting among these criteria in the evaluation of the houses in the selected region. Relationships between these criteria were determined with the help of literature research and expert opinions. In order to carry out this study, analyzes made with the help of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) were used. Distance maps of each criterion were produced and then a spatial value map was produced using the weighting obtained by the Analytical Hierarchy Process. As a result; The value of the immovables located within the boundaries of Hacıkaymak District in Konya/Selçuklu has been determined according to their spatial characteristics.

Article Details

How to Cite
Özsubaşı, B., & Ertaş, M. (2022). The spatial evaluation of the real estates in the Konya- Hacıkaymak Neighborhood with the analytical hierarchy process method . Advanced Land Management, 2(2), 51–59. Retrieved from


Açlar, A., & Çağdaş, V. (2008). Real Estate Valuation. Chamber of Survey and Cadastral Engineers, ISBN: 978-9944-89-558-3.

Yalpır, Ş. (2014). Forecasting Residential Real Estate Values with AHP Method and Integrated GIS. In International Scientific Conference of People, Buildings and Environment (pp. 15-17).

Bozdağ, A., & Ertunç, E. (2020). GIS and AHP Method Could Not Be Implemented in the Niğde City Example. Geomatics, 5(3), 228-240.

Alkan, T., & Durduran S. S. (2021). Examination of Real Estate Valuation in Tourism Cities with the Help of GIS and AHP Method: The Case of Alanya City. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 10(1), 178-187.

Yalpır, S. (2007). Development and application of real estate valuation model with fuzzy logic methodology: The case of Konya.

Yalpır, S., & Ünel, F.B. (2016). Examination of the people used in land valuation in Turkey and internationally and its reduction with Factor Analysis. Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Science and Engineering, 16(2), 303-322.

Özcan, T. (2019). Analitik Hiyerarşi Yöntemi (AHP) kullanılarak Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemi (CBS) destekli taşınmaz değer haritası üretimi (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey)).

Tunca, E., & Üstüntaş, T. (2019). Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods in Creating Real Estate Valuation Model. TMMOB, 6, 23-25.

Ertaş, M. (2019). Education for real estate valuation in Turkey. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 4(1), 8-15.

Özgüven, M., & Erenoğlu, R. C. (2020). Generating Real Estate Value Maps with Geographic Information Systems: The Example of Çanakkale. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation, 7(1), 29-46.

Vaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic Hierarchy Process: An Overview of Applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29.

Saaty, R. W. (1987). The Analytic Hierarchy Process—What It Is and How It Is Used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176.

Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision Making with The Analytic Hierarchy Process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Yalpır, Ş., & Ekiz, M. (2017). Use of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Equivalency Based Land and Land Arrangement. Ömer Halisdemir University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 6(1), 59-75.

Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European journal of operational research, 48(1), 9-26. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98.

Bunruamkaew, K. (2012). Site Suitability Evaluation for Ecotourism Using GIS & AHP: A Case Study of Surat Thani Province, Thailand University of Tsukuba.

Google Maps, (2021). Konya- Hacıkaymak Mahallesi, Konya, [Access Date: 19.11.2021],