Elimination of unqualified additions that distort the silhouette of the historical places: Artuklu example
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Mardin-Artuklu urban protected area has a unique historical texture, topography and sociological richness, which is rarely seen in the world, with its vibrant urban texture that has continued in the long historical process. The increase in the number of reinforced concrete structures and add-on techniques over time in this well-established residential area has led to the deterioration of the qualitative stone texture. These deteriorations have increased especially after the 1950s and have led to its present appearance. Due to the use of reinforced concrete, the process of deterioration in the historical-urban texture has manifested itself with many negative effects. In the process of being a livable example of the concept of "tourism attraction", which is mentioned in the national strategy plans, especially in the development and other upper-scale plans of the area, reinforced concrete structures constitute one of the most important problems in its inclusion in the permanent heritage list. In this study, it is aimed to examine the importance of the demolition of reinforced concrete structures and their annexes, which are not suitable for the historical and cultural texture within the Artuklu Urban Site Boundaries in the Artuklu District of Mardin City, in revealing the historical texture of the area, through various examples in the Artuklu Site Management model management plan. In the current study, archival research, observational detection, photographic documentation and interview methods were used to determine the physical and socioeconomic contributions of demolition works. As a result, the importance of the demolition of the reinforced concrete structure and its annexes in revealing the historical texture of the area is examined with some examples, and various suggestions are presented according to the system in the management plan.
Article Details
References
Alanyalı, F. (2013). Arkeolojik alan yönetimi, Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını.
Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2013). Çatalhöyük neolitik kenti yönetim planı. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı (2015). Ani arkeolojik alanı yönetim planı. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
Güçhan, N. Ş. (2017). Kommagene Nemrut Yönetim Plani.
Akan Mimarlık (2013). Bursa (Hanlar Bölgesi ve Sultan Külliyeleri) ve Cumalıkızık yönetim planı. Bursa Büyükşehir Belediyesi.
Mimar Sinan Güzel Sanatlar Üniversitesi Şehircilik Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi (2013). Aphrodisias antik kenti alan yönetim planı. Ankara: Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı.
Şahin, E (2008). Alan yönetimi süreçleri: Japonya ve Türkiye. (Yayınlanmamış Uzmanlık Tezi). Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı Kültür Varlıkları ve Müzeler Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
Ringbeck B. (2014). Doğal, kentsel ve sosyal çerçevede koruma ve alan yönetimi: Dünya kültür mirası alanları için yönetim planları kültür mirasının korunması için entegre planlama ve uygulama tasarıları, editörler: Martin, B., Çiğdem, M., Seçil, T., Duygu, G., Miras, Ege Yayınları, İstanbul, 1-11.
Middleton, V. (1996). Vision, strategy and corporate planning: An overview. A. Harrison (Der.). Manual of Heritage Management. Oxford: Butterworth & Heinemann. 3-11.
Thomas, L. & Middleton J. (2003). Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. The World Conservation Union, Switzerland, 79.
Vicente, G.J. & Smirnow, L. (2010). Management plans and the world heritage convention: a bibliography. ICOMOS Documentation Centre. Paris.
Wainwright, G. J. (1989). The management of English landscape. H. Cleere (Der.), Archaeological heritage management in the modern world. One World Archaeology, 9, 164-170
Schofield, J. (2008). Heritage management, Theory and practice: Heritage Reader, Ed.:Fairclough, G., Routledge, London, 15-30.
Thomas L., Middleton J., & Philips A., (2003). Guidelines for management planning of protected areas. Best Practice Protected Area Guidelines Series, 10.
Wainwright, G. J. (1989). The management of English landscape. H. Cleere (Der.), Archaeological heritage management in the modern world. One World Archaeology,9, 164-170
Wijesuriya, G, Thompson, J. & Young, C. (2013). Managing cultural world heritage. Paris: UNESCO.
Unesco World Heritage Centre (2015). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. Paris: UNESCO.