The public-private partnership (PPP) in the provision of land registry and cadastre services in Türkiye

Main Article Content

Volkan Deniz
Mert Kayalık
Osman Sami Kırtıloğlu
Zeynel Abidin Polat

Abstract

The tendencies of privatization and reorganization in the world turn the tasks done by the public sector into the private sector. The Public-private partnership (PPP) is defined as the project that the public and private sector cooperate on the financing, operation and management of the environment, housing, transportation, water, sewage, solid waste, and land management. The use of PPP as an effective tool in developing infrastructure and superstructure projects and providing faster and more quality services has a long history. The use of PPPs for land administration services is less common, though there are a few notable successes in developed countries. Many of the tasks necessary for the establishment and maintenance of a cadastral system can be realized by the private sector under public control. Activities such as preparation and registration of title deeds, cadastral mapping, zoning implementations can be carried out by private sector or mixed economic organizations. As emphasized by the Cadastre 2014 vision, the PPP approach can provide a model for completing land administration-based reforms throughout the country and maintaining the success of a given project. The aim of study is to help identify the most appropriate strategy for ensuring private sector, and public institution (General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre-GDLRC), which is the responsible for land administration and cadastre system in Türkiye, cooperation. In this study, the activities carried out jointly by GDLRC and private sector were determined and the legal, institutional and technical situation required for carrying out these activities were analyzed. As a result of the analysis, superior or weaknesses of the public-private sector cooperation in current land administration and cadastral system in Türkiye with opportunities and threats arising from the external environment were identified by the SWOT matrix. According to the SWOT analysis, the biggest obstacle to public-private cooperation is the existence of too many legislations and institutions on land administration. In order to further increase the cooperation between the public and private sectors, it is necessary to eliminate the deficiencies in the legislation and to develop policies for the participation of the private sector in land administration activities.

Article Details

How to Cite
Deniz, V., Kayalık, M., Kırtıloğlu, O. S., & Polat, Z. A. (2023). The public-private partnership (PPP) in the provision of land registry and cadastre services in Türkiye. Advanced Land Management, 3(1), 41–53. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/alm/article/view/887
Section
Articles

References

Eriçok, R. E. (2019). Türkiye’de kamu-özel ortaklığına ilişkin güncel durum. Maliye Araştirmalari 3, 175-194

Kaul, I., & Conceicao, P. (2006). Why revisit public finance today. The new public finance: Responding to global challenges. New York: Oxford University Press (for the UNDP), 3-27.

Kılıçaslan, H. (2017). Devletin değişen rolü ve kamu özel işbirlikleri. Ankara, Savaş Yayınevi, 148

The World Bank. (2018). Private participation in infrastructure database (PPI). https://ppi.worldbank.org/en/snapshots/rankings

Ersin, M. (2021). A study on smart urbanization research in Mersin Metropolitan Municipality. Advanced Land Management, 1(1), 7-15.

Doğruyol, F. Y., & Taktak, F. (2022). Assessment of the post-disaster assembly areas in the Merkez District of Uşak Province in Turkey. Advanced Land Management, 2(1), 1-12.

Creuzer, P., & B. Kjellson. (2005). Public-private partnership (PPP) in land administration. United Nations, Committee on human settlements, Working party on land administration, 1-6.

T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. (2018). Kamu-özel işbirliği raporu 2017: Dünyada ve Türkiye’de kamu-özel işbirliği uygulamalarına ilişkin gelişmeler raporu.

The World Bank. (2016). About public-private partnerships. https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/about-public-privatepartnerships.

Ndandiko, C., & Ibanda S. J. (2015). Public-private partnerships guidelines for local governments.

Sarısu, A. (2009). Kamu-özel işbirlikleri. Yaklaşım Yayınları, Ankara.

Zhang, X. (2005). Paving the way for public–private partnerships in infrastructure development. Journal of construction Engineering and Management, 131(1), 71-80.

Şahin, M., & Uysal, Ö. (2008). Kamu ekonomisi perspektifinden kamu-özel sektör ortaklıkları. Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.

Land Equity International. (2018). Exploring PPPs in land administration. Research & Analysis on Land Administration.

The World Bank. (2006). Cost recovery policies, PPPs and sustainability of land records management in India. Workshop on Land Administration and Land Policy.

Nikolic, I. A., & Maikisch, H. (2006). Public-private partnerships and collaboration in the health sector: an overview with case studies from recent European experience, Health, Nutrition and Population (HNP) Discussion Papers

Uysal, Y. (2017). Yerel yönetimlerde kamu özel işbirliği (KÖİ) uygulamalarının iki yönü: avantajlar ve dezavantajlar. Kent Akademisi, 10(2), 169-199.

TKGM, (2018). 2018 yılı idari faaliyet raporu

Döner, F., & Bıyık, C. (2022). Three-dimensional cadastre-from two-dimensional plan to three-dimensional digital model. Advanced Land Management, 2(1), 40-50.

Alkan, M., & Polat, Z. A. (2021). Lisans ve lisansüstü düzeyinde verilen taşınmaz değerleme eğitiminin değerleme lisansı sınavı kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. Geomatik, 6(1), 15-30.

Büyük, G., & Ünel, F. B. (2021). Comparison of modern methods using the python programming language in mass housing valuation. Advanced Land Management, 1(1), 23-31.

Özsubaşı, B., & Ertaş, M. (2022). The spatial evaluation of the real estates in the Konya-Hacıkaymak Neighborhood with the analytical hierarchy process method. Advanced Land Management, 2(2), 51-59.

Kayalık, M., & Polat, Z. A. (2023). CBS destekli nominal taşınmaz değer haritasının 3 boyutlu sunumu: Berlin Eyaleti örneği. Geomatik, 8(2), 180-191.

Türkiye Değerleme Uzmanları Birliği. (2018). Değerleme sektörü analizi. http://www.tdub.org.tr/Images/Uploads/TGBM_rapor_2018_3_ceyrek(ilk_9ay).pdf

Erdem, N. (2021). Content analysis of real estate valuation courses taught in geomatics engineering departments in Turkey. Advanced Land Management, 1(1), 1-6.

Uçar, D., & Doğru, A. Ö. (2005). CBS projelerinin stratejik planlamasi ve Swot analizinin yeri. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası, 10.

Aydinoglu, A. Ç. (2011). Sosyoteknolojik yaklaşımlarla konumsal veri altyapısı kurulması sürecinde mevcut durum değerlendirmesi. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı.