Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Articles

Advantages and disadvantages of using TLS techniques in monumental buildings; Darsiyak Yanartaş Monastery Archangel Michael and Gabriel Church Example

Published 2021-09-26

Keywords

  • Lidar,
  • Terrestrial Laser Scanning,
  • Orthophoto

How to Cite

KOCA, M., & KOZLU, H. H. (2021). Advantages and disadvantages of using TLS techniques in monumental buildings; Darsiyak Yanartaş Monastery Archangel Michael and Gabriel Church Example. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 1–5. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/lidar/article/view/55

Abstract

Monumental buildings are considered as a building group that includes many different types of buildings, such as mosques, churches, madrasas, caravanserais, inns, and baths, built for public use. Each of these buildings has spatial characteristics that vary according to the type of building, periodical differences and regional character. However, it is seen that the majority of these buildings have a plan setup consisting of small spaces that are articulated to a large and central space. Among the monumental buildings, one of the building types that show this central place feature is the churches. While the use of terrestrial laser scanning method in the measurements of churches with central space provides many advantages, it also causes some disadvantages. In this study, measurements of the Yanartaş Monastery Archangel Michael and Gabriel Church, one of the 19th century Kayseri churches, was made with a terrestrial laser scanning system for documentation studies and the advantages and disadvantages of this measurement system were conveyed.

References

  1. Alptekin A, Çelik M Ö & Yakar M. (2019). Anıtmezarın yersel lazer tarayıcı kullanarak 3B modellenmesi. Turkey Lidar Journal, 1(1), 1-4.
  2. Altuntaş C & Yıldız F (2008). Survey Principles of Terrestrial Laser Scanners and Combination of 3D Point Clouds. Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation (98), 20-27.
  3. Erdal K & Hasan M B (2021). Documentation of Cultural Heritage with Backpack LIDAR Usage on Photogrammetric Purpose. Turkey LIDAR Journal, 3(1), 01-06.
  4. Faro (2021). https://www.faro.com/en/Products/Hardware/Focus-Laser-Scanners , 24.09.2021
  5. Gümüş M (2010). A study on usability of terrestrial laser scanning for deformation monitoring. Master Thesis, Selçuk University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Surveying Engineering, Konya, 99 p.
  6. Kaya F (2020). A field study investigating structural defects in the x, y, z plane of conventional structures with the help of bim technology and laser. Master Thesis, Fırat University, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Elazığ, 124 p.
  7. Orhan O & Yakar M (2016). Investigating land surface temperature changes using Landsat data in Konya, Turkey. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 41, B8.
  8. Temizer T, Nemli G, Ekizce E, Ekizce A, Demir S, Bayram B & Yilmaz H (2013). 3D Documentation of a Historical Monument Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning Case Study: Byzantine Water Cistern, Istanbul. Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XXIV International CIPA Symposium. (s. 623-628). Strasbourg.
  9. Yakar M, Yılmaz H M & Mutluoǧlu Ö (2010). Comparative evaluation of excavation volume by TLS and total topographic station based methods.
  10. Yakar M, Yılmaz H M, Güleç S A & Korumaz M (2009). Advantage of digital close range photogrammetry in drawing of muqarnas in architecture.
  11. Yilmaz H M, Yakar M, Mutluoglu O, Kavurmaci M M & Yurt K (2012). Monitoring of soil erosion in Cappadocia region (Selime-Aksaray-Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences, 66(1), 75-81.