Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Articles

Survey Process of Gesi Pigeonry with Ground Laser by (Point Cloud) Scanning Method

Published 2021-09-26

Keywords

  • Lidar,
  • Gesi Pigeonry,
  • Laser Scanning,
  • Point Cloud

How to Cite

ALBAYRAK, M., & BÜYÜKMIHCI , G. (2021). Survey Process of Gesi Pigeonry with Ground Laser by (Point Cloud) Scanning Method. Advanced LiDAR, 1(1), 06–17. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/lidar/article/view/56

Abstract

The pigeons, which are accepted as the symbol of peace and love, are one of the first domesticated birds by people. Pigeons have been bred up for 6000 years since they are used in postal services, feeding as a hobby, benefiting from meat, manure, and egg for different purposes. There are special pigeon nests made for pigeons in the world. The nests in the Kayseri Gesi Region, which are described as a dovecote, are special structures that are unique in the world and are designed to obtain the pigeon manure used in agriculture. The unique feature of the gothic cavern is that the main nest is made of carved chambers under the ground and on the ground a dovetail chimney, a dovecote or a dovecote tower. As it is seen in this study which is related to dovecotes, it has the function, form, and organization of each other with its unique local artifacts. However, in the globalizing world, the necessity of adding the original identity of the dovecotes to the world cultural heritage is determined. Preserving cultural heritage is an imperative task for all civilizations in the world. In order to keep the traces of civilizations alive, it is extremely necessary to transfer historical and cultural artifacts from generation to generation. Terrestrial laser scanning method has become the reason of choice for many disciplines with its potential to obtain cost-effective, high-accuracy data in a short time. Laser scanners, which ensure that architectural documentation works are carried out in a healthy way and in accordance with the determined standards, have become preferred by users in our country and in the world. Different from traditional methods, terrestrial laser scanning method was preferred for the preparation of survey projects of Gesi dovecotes. Terrestrial scanning device has replaced traditional measurement methods with the rapidly developing technology. The laser scanning method has advantages over traditional methods in terms of speed, workflow and workforce. Using a laser scanner for accurate measurement allows accurate preparation of survey projects. By using local laser scanning technologies, thousands of points reflecting the object or object surface are obtained. With the help of these points, realistic 3D models are obtained. According to the models created, area, volume and surface dimensions can be reached according to the size information of the object or structure. 3D point cloud data about the plan scheme, sections and facades of Gesi dovecotes, which are of historical importance, were obtained by using Faro Focus 3d laser scanning device.

References

  1. Akgül M, Yurtseven H, Akburak S & Çoban S (2016). Yersel lazer tarayıcı sistemler ile kentsel yeşil alanlarda bazı ağaç parametrelerinin belirlenmesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University dergisi, 445-458.
  2. Allen P K, Troccoli A, Benjamin S & Murray S (2003). New Methods for Digital Modeling of Historic Sites 3D Reconstruction and Visualization. IEEE Computer Society, 32-41.
  3. Alptekin A, Fidan Ş, Karabacak A, Çelik M Ö & Yakar M (2019). Üçayak Örenyeri'nin yersel lazer tarayıcı kullanılarak modellenmesi. Turkey Lidar Journal, 1(1), 16-20.
  4. Alshawabkeh Y (2006). Integration of Lazer Scanning and Photogrammetry for Heritage Documentation. Stuttgart.
  5. Altuntaş C & Yıldız F (2008). Yersel Lazer Tarayıcı Ölçme Prensipleri ve Nokta Bulutlarının Birleştirilmesi. HKM, Jeodezi, Jeoinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi, 20-27.
  6. Amirkhani A, Okhovat H & Zamani E (2010, July ). Ancient pigeon houses: Remarkable example of the Asian culture crystallized in the architecture of Iran and Central Anatolia. Asian Culture and History, ss: 45-57.
  7. Avunduk A (2010). Şefkat Estetiği Kuşevleri. İstanbul Zeytinburnu Belediyesi Kültür Yayınları, 181-193.
  8. Bekleyen A (2007). Diyarbakır Kırsalındaki Güvercin Evleri: Boranhaneler, Karaçalı (Tilalo) Köyü. Trakya Univ J Sci, 99-107.
  9. Büyükmıhcı G (2006). 19. Yüzyıl Anadolu’sundan Günümüze Yansıyan Özgün Bir Tarımsal Ticaret Yapısı: Güvercinlikler. 35.
  10. Büyükmıhçı, G. (2006). 19. Yüzyıl Anadolu’sundan Günümüze Yansıyan Özgün Bir Tarımsal T Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 35.
  11. Büyükmıhçı, G. (2006). 19. Yüzyıl Anadolu’sundan Günümüze Yansıyan Özgün Bir Tarımsal Ti97-119.
  12. Calegari F (2003). Sustainable development prospects for Italian coastal cultural heritage: a Ligurian case study. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 49-56.
  13. Dunning S A, Massey C I & Rosser N J (2009). Structural and geomorphological features of landslides in the Bhutan Himalaya derived from Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Geomorphology, 17-29.
  14. Ergincan F, Çabuk A, Avdan U & Tün M (2010). Advanced technologies for rchaeological documentation:Patara case. Scientific Research and Essays Vol., 2615-2629.
  15. Grussenmeyer P, Landes T, Voegtle T & Ringle K (2008). Comparıson Methods Of Terrestrial Laser Scannıng, Photogrammetry And Tacheometry Data For Recording of Cultural Heritage Buildings. The International Archives of the photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. Beijing.
  16. Hasbay U & Hattap S (2017). Doğal Taşlardaki Bozunma (Ayrışma) Türleri ve Nedenleri. Bilim Ve Gençlik Dergisi, 23-45.
  17. Karasaka L & Ulutaş N (2021). CAD-Based Modeling Using Three Dimensional Point Cloud Data. Türkiye LİDAR Dergisi, 25-30.
  18. Karasaka L (2012). Mobil yersel lazer tarama sistemlerinin fotogrametrik rölöve projelerinde kullanılabilirliği üzerine bir çalışma. Konya.
  19. Kuçak R A, Kılıç F & Kısa A (2014). Tarihi Eserlerin Dokümantasyonunda Çeşitli Veri Toplama Yöntemlerinin İncelenmesi. 5. Uzaktan Algılama-Cbs Sempozyumu (UZAL-CBS 2014). İstanbul.
  20. Larsson S & Kjellander J (2006). Motion control and data capturing for laser scanning with an industrial robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 453–460.
  21. Okuyucu Ş E & Çoban G (2019). Afyonkarahisar Dinar Bademli Köyü Cami Röleve Projesinin Lazer Tarama Yöntemiyle Hazırlanması. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 249-262.
  22. Öcal A & Dal M (2012). Doğal Taşlardaki Bozunmalar. Kırklareli: Mimarlık Vakfı İktisadi İşletmesi.
  23. Örmecioğlu H (2010). Tarihi Yapıların Yapısal Güçlendirilmesinde Ana İlkeler ve Yaklaşımlar. Politeknik Dergisi, 233-237.
  24. Özkul I F & Özkul A (2021, 09 24). https://gesivakfi.org/egitim-faaliyetlerimiz/96-gesi/tarihi-ve-kulturel-yapisi/guvercinlikler. https://gesivakfi.org/egitim-faaliyetlerimiz/96-gesi/tarihi-ve-kulturel-yapisi/guvercinlikler.
  25. Reshetyuk Y (2006). Investigation and calibration of pulsed time of flight terrestrial laser scanners. 1-55. Stockholm.
  26. Riveiro B, Morer P, Arias P & De Arteaga I (2011). Terrestrial laser scanning and limit analysis of masonry arch bridges. Construction and Building Materials, 1726-1735.
  27. Sevgen S C (2018). LiDAR VERİLERİNDEN BİNA ÇATI DÜZLEMİ OTOMATİK ÇIKARIM MODELİ GELİŞTİRME. Trabzon.
  28. Ulvi A & Yakar M (2014). Yersel Lazer Tarama Tekniği Kullanarak Kızkalesi’nin Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi ve Lazer Tarama Noktalarının Hassasiyet Araştırması. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 6(1), 25-36.
  29. Uzun T İ & Spor Y (2019). Yersel Lazer (Nokta Bulut) Tarama Yöntemi ile Rölöve-Restitüsyon-Restorasyon Projesi Hazırlama Süreci ve Bir Örnek: Elazığ Harput Kale Hamamı. Tasarım Kuram, 1-26.
  30. Varlık A, Uray F & Metin A (2016). Sokak Sağlıklaştırma Projelerinde Yersel Lazer Tarayıcı İle Mimari Rölöve Alımı: Afyonkarahisar Kentsel Sit Alanı Örneği. Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 141-150.
  31. Varol F, Ulvi A & Yakar M (2018). Kültürel Mirasın Dokümantasyonunda Yersel Fotogrametri Tekniğinin Kullanılması: Sazak Köprüsü Örneği. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 986-991.
  32. www.unesco.org.tr. (2021).
  33. Yakar M, Bünyan Ünel F & Kuşak L (2020). Ölçme Bilgisi 2. Atlas Akademi.
  34. Yakar M, Orhan O, Ulvi A, Yiğit A Y & Yüzer M M (2015). Sahip Ata Külliyesi Rölöve Örneği. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Mühendisleri Odası 15. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı. Ankara.
  35. Yastıklı N (2007). Documentation of cultural heritage using digital photogrammetry and laser scanning. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 423-427.
  36. Yılmaz H M & Yakar M (2006). Lidar (Light Detection And Ranging) Tarama Sistemi. Yapı Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 2(2), 23-33.