Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022)
Articles

Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion

Published 2022-09-30

Keywords

  • Analytical Survey,
  • Cultural Heritage,
  • Terrestrial Laser Scanning,
  • Orthophoto,
  • Sustanibility

How to Cite

Karataş , L. ., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 54–63. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/lidar/article/view/675

Abstract

Manual mapping or traditional methods of architectural documentation by an expert in historical buildings are today considered time-consuming and laborious procedures. In recent years, with the development of technology, the use of digital tools to support architectural documentation activities has provided more detailed results on architectural analysis and has simplified processes which were performed manually. The Historical Sur Mansion, located in the Diyarbakır urban protected area, which is the subject of the study, is a historical building that reflects the general characteristics of traditional houses in Diyarbakır, containing its own characteristics, formed by factors such as topography, materials, climate as well as cultural elements in the immediate environment. The building has been registered as a "monumental" structure to be protected by the Council of Europe's Natural and Cultural Heritage Conservation Inventory and the General Directorate of Turkish Cultural Heritage and Museums. The decorations and inscriptions on the iwans, window and door openings of the building are examples of Diyarbakır residential architecture. The aim of the study is to obtain the analytical surveys of the historical Sur Mansion, which is a great necessity for the sustainability of the cultural heritage in the region, by using orthophotos produced by various techniques from laser scanning as a base. Researches carried out on the studied area have shown that by using the orthophotos produced from the data obtained from terrestrial laser scanning as a base, data with sufficient level of detail needed in architectural documentation can be obtained today, and this method offers an economically effective and fast solution to produce analytical surveys.

References

  1. Alptekin, A., Çelik, M. Ö. & Yakar, M. (2019). Anıtmezarın yersel lazer tarayıcı kullanarak 3B modellenmesi. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 1(1), 1-4.
  2. Alptekin, A., Fidan, Ş., Karabacak, A., Çelik, M. Ö., & Yakar, M. (2019). Üçayak Örenyeri'nin yersel lazer tarayıcı kullanılarak modellenmesi. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 1(1), 16-20.
  3. Alyilmaz, C., Yakar,M. & Yılmaz,H.M.(2010). Drawing Of Petroglyphs In Mongolia By Close Range Photogrammetry. Scientific-Research and Essays, 5(11), 1216–1222.
  4. Barber, D. M., Dallas, R. W. & Mills, J. P. (2006). Laser scanning for architectural conservation. Archit. Conserv. 12, 35–52.
  5. Comert, R., Avdan, U., Tün, M. & Ersoy Mirici, M. (2012). Mimari Belgelemede Yersel Lazer Tarama Yönteminin Uygulanması (Seyitgazi Askerlik Şubesi Örneği). Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi. 4. 1-18.
  6. Del Pozo, S., Herrero-Pascual, J., Felipe-García, B., Hernández-López, D., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez & González- Aguilera, D. (2016). Multispectral Radiometric Analysis of Façades to Detect Pathologies from Active and Passive Remote Sensing. Remote Sens. 2016, 8 (1), 80.
  7. Doğan, Y., & Yakar, M. (2018). GIS and three-dimensional modeling for cultural heritages. International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences, 3(2), 50-55.
  8. Gabriele, G., Danilo, G. & Marco, B. (2010). The Employment of Terrestrial Laser Scanner in Cultural Heritage Conservation: The Case Study of Vallinotto Chapel in Carignano-Italy, Applied Geomatics, 2(2), 59-63.
  9. Georgopoulos, A., Tsakiri, M., Ioannidis, C. & Kakli, A. (2004). Large scale orthophotography using DTM from terrestrial laser scanning. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 35.
  10. Guldur, B., Yan, Y. & Hajjar, J.F. (2015). Condition Assessment of Bridges Using Terrestrial Laser Scanners. Structures Congress 2015- Proceedings of the 2015 Structures Congress, 355-366.
  11. Yilmaz, I., Bildirici, I. O., Yakar, M., & Yildiz, F. (2004), Color calibration of scanners using polynomial transformation. In XXth ISPRS Congress Commission V, Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 890-896).
  12. Kanun, E., Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2021). Documentation of cultural heritage by photogrammetric methods: a case studyof Aba's Monumental Tomb. 3rdIntercontinental Geoinformation Days (IGD), 168-171, Mersin, Turkey
  13. Karkaş, Z.S. & Acun, Ö. S. (2021). Tarihi Yapılarda Kagir Yapı Malzemelerinin Koruma Uygulamalarında Kullanılabilecek Bir Yöntem Önerisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi , 25 (3) , 564-577 .
  14. Karataş, L. (2022). Investigating the historical building materials with spectroscopic and geophysical methods: A case study of Mardin Castle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 7 (3), 266-278. https://doi.org/ 10.31127/tuje.1145711.
  15. Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., Kanun, E., & Yakar, M. (2022). Tarihi kârgir yapılarda taş malzeme bozulmalarının İHA fotogrametrisi kullanarak tespiti ve belgelenmesi: Mersin Kanlıdivane ören yeri vaka çalışması. İçel Dergisi, 2 (2), 41-49.
  16. Kaya, Y., Yiğit, A. Y., Ulvi, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Arkeolojik alanların dokümantasyonununda fotogrametrik tekniklerinin doğruluklarının karşılaştırmalı analizi: Konya Yunuslar Örneği. Harita Dergisi, 87(165), 57-72.
  17. Kaya, Y., Yiğit, A. Y., Ulvi, A., & Yakar, M. (2021). Arkeolojik alanların dokümantasyonununda fotogrametrik tekniklerinin doğruluklarının karşılaştırmalı analizi: Konya Yunuslar Örneği. Harita Dergisi, 87(165), 57-72.
  18. Kocaman, E. & Yakar, M. (2017). Kayseri-Sahabiye Medresesi 3-Boyutlu Modelleme Çalışması ve Animasyonu. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 10(1), 133-138.
  19. Korumaz, A. G., Korumaz, M., Dulgerlera, O. N., Karasaka, L., Yıldız, F., & Yakar, M. (2010). Evaluation of laser scanner performance in documentation of historical and architectural ruins, a case study in Konya. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 38(5), 361-366.
  20. Korumaz, A. G., Dülgerler, O. N., & Yakar, M. (2012). Digital Techniques in Cultural Heritage Documentation. Selçuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology.
  21. Koska, B. & Křemen, T. (2013). The Combination of Laser Scanning and Structure from Motion Technology for Creation of Accurate Exterior and Interior Orthophotos of ST. Nicholas Baroque Church”, ISPRS- International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information, XL5, 133–138. doi:10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W1-133-2013.
  22. Lerones, P.M., Fernandez, J.L., Gil, A.M., Gomez-Garcia-Bermejo, J. & Casanova, E. Z. (2010). A Practical Approach to Making Accurate 3D Layouts of Interesting Cultural Heritage Sites Through Digital Models", Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11 (1), 1-9.
  23. Meroño, J., Perea, A., Aguilera, M. & Laguna, A. (2015). Recognition of materials and damage on historical buildings using digital image classification. South African Journal of Science. 111. 1-9. 10.17159/sajs.2015/20140001.
  24. Mirdan, O., & Yakar, M. (2017). Tarihi eserlerin İnsansız Hava Aracı ile modellenmesinde karşılaşılan sorunlar. Geomatik, 2(3), 118-125.
  25. Mol, A., Cabaleiro, M., Sousa, H., lder, S. & Branco, J, M. (2020). HBIM for storing life-cycle data regarding decay and damage in existing timber structures. Automation in Construction, 117(), 103262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103262.
  26. Nicola, C., Massimiliano, G., Silvia, G., Vittorio, G., Chiara, P. & Gian Marco, V. (2020). On the accuracy of UAV photogrammetric survey for the evaluation of historic masonry structural damages. Procedia Structural Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.153
  27. Olsen, M., Kuester, F., Chang, B. & Hutchinson, T. (2010). Terrestrial Laser Scanning-Based Structural Damage Assessment. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24(3), 263-272.
  28. Pulat, F., Yakar, M., & Ulvi, A. (2022). Comparison of photogrammetric software using the terrestrial photogrammetric method: The case of Hüsrev Paşa Mosque. Intercontinental Geoinformation Days, 4, 192-195.
  29. Russo, M. (2017). Il colore nel rilievo e nella rappresentazione di beni archeologici. XIII Conferenza del Colore,405–16.
  30. Russo, M. & Manferdini. A. M. (2014). Integration of image and range-based techniques for surveying complex architectures. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-5:305–12. https://doi.org/ 10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-305-2014.
  31. Stober, D., Zarnic, R., Penava, D., Turkalj Podmanicki, M. & Virgej-Đurašević, R. (2018). Application of HBIM as a Research Tool for Historical Building Assessment. Civil Engineering Journal.
  32. Şasi, A. & Yakar, M. (2017). Photogrammetric Modelling Of Sakahane Masjid Using An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle. Turkish Journal of Engineering, 1 (2), 82-87.
  33. Ulvi, A. & Yakar, M. (2010). An experimental study on preparing photogrammetric rolove plans of antique theatres. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 5(7), 1086-1092.
  34. Ulvi, A., Yiğit, A. Y., & Yakar, M. (2016). Yakın mesafe fotogrametrik teknikler kullanılarak tarihi çeşmelerin modellenmesi, Mersin Fotogrametri Dergisi.
  35. Ulvi, A. & Yakar, M. (2014). Yersel Lazer Tarama Tekniği Kullanarak Kızkalesi’nin Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi ve Lazer Tarama Noktalarının Hassasiyet Araştırması . Harita Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi , 6 (1) , 25-36 .
  36. Ulvi, A. Yakar, M., Toprak, A. S., & Mutluoglu, O. (2014). Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Evaluation of Uzuncaburç Monumental Entrance. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics and Computers, 3(1), 32-36.
  37. Ulvi, A., Yiğit A. Y., & Yakar, M. (2019). Modeling of Historical Fountains by Using Close-Range Photogrammetric Techniques. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 1(1), 1-6.
  38. Uysal, M., Polat, N., Toprak, A. S., & Yakar, M. (2013). 3d modeling of historical doger caravansaries by digital photogrammetry.
  39. Yakar, M., Yılmaz, H. M. & Mutluoǧlu, Ö. (2010). Comparative evaluation of excavation volume by TLS and total topographic station-based methods. Lasers in Eng, 19, 331-345.
  40. Yakar, M, Yılmaz, H. M., Yıldız, F., Zeybek, M., Şentürk, H. & Çelik, H. (2009). Silifke-Mersin Bölgesinde Roma Dönemi Eserlerinin 3 Boyutlu Modelleme Çalışması ve Animasyonu. Jeodezi, Jeoinformasyon ve Arazi Yönetimi Dergisi,101
  41. Yakar, M., & Doğan, Y. (2017). Mersin Silifke Mezgit Kale Anıt Mezarı Fotogrametrik Rölöve Alımı Ve Üç Boyutlu Modelleme Çalışması. Geomatik, 2(1), 11-17.
  42. Yakar, M. (2015). Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Evaluation of Uzuncaburç Monumental Entrance. International Journal of Applied Mathematics, Electronics and Computers. 3.
  43. Yakar, M., Ulvi, A., & Toprak, A. S. (2015). The Problems and Solution Offers, Faced During The 3d Modeling Process Of Sekiliyurt Underground Shelters With Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 2(2), 39-45.
  44. Yakar, M. & Omar,M. (2016). Yersel Fotogrametrik Yöntem İle İbadethanelerin Modellenmesi. Selçuk Teknik Online Dergisi. 15. 2-20162.
  45. Yakar, M & Mirdan, Ö (2017). Tarihi Eserlerin İnsansız Hava Aracı İle Modellenmesinde Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Geomatik Dergisi, 2(3), 118-125.
  46. Yakar, M. & Dogan, Y. (2019). 3D Reconstruction of Residential Areas with SfM Photogrammetry. In: El-Askary, H., Lee, S., Heggy, E., Pradhan, B. (eds) Advances in Remote Sensing and Geo Informatics Applications. CAJG 2018. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01440-7_18
  47. Yılmaz, H. M. & Yakar, M. (2006). Yersel Lazer Tarama Teknolojisi. Yapı Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, (2), 43-48
  48. Yılmaz, H. M.& Yakar, M. (2000). Yersel fotogrametrinin kullanım alanları. Niğde Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(1), 1.