Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023)
Articles

3D Modeling of Mufti Abdullah Sıddık Mosque using Wearable Mobile LiDAR

PDF
  • Atilla Karabacak,
  • Murat Yakar

Published 2023-03-31

Keywords

  • Building Modeling,
  • Wearable Mobile Lidar,
  • Photogrammetry,
  • Laser Scanning,
  • 3D

How to Cite

Karabacak, A., & Yakar, M. . (2023). 3D Modeling of Mufti Abdullah Sıddık Mosque using Wearable Mobile LiDAR. Advanced LiDAR, 3(1), 01–09. Retrieved from https://publish.mersin.edu.tr/index.php/lidar/article/view/865

Abstract

Mobile LIDAR, which can be attached to any moving vehicle, started to be used after 2000. In recent years, Wearable Mobile LiDAR (WML), which can be carried by wearing it on a person, has started to be used. WML is used for mapping and 3D modeling of interior and narrow places that cannot be reached by any vehicle and only one person can enter. In this study, 3D model and orthophoto of Mufti Abdullah Sıddık Mosque located in Mersin University Çiftlikköy campus were produced. With WML, data were collected in a short time like 13 minutes in the field and the produced orthophoto and 3D models were produced within the error limit. When the system is used fast and based on Ground Control Points (GCP), it gives results within the error limits. This study demonstrates the usability of WML in structure modeling and mapping.

PDF

References

  1. Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2021). Lazer Tarayıcının Jeolojik Olayların Modellenmesinde Kullanımı. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3 (2), 71-75. DOI: 10.51946/melid.1018197
  2. Alptekin, A., Çelik, M. Ö., Doğan, Y. & Yakar, M. (2022, February). Illustrating of a landslide site with photogrammetric and LIDAR methods. In Research Developments in Geotechnics, Geo-Informatics and Remote Sensing: Proceedings of the 2nd Springer Conference of the Arabian Journal of Geosciences (CAJG-2), Tunisia 2019 (pp. 303-305). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  3. Cabo, C., Del Pozo, S., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Ordóñez, C. & Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. (2018). Comparing terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and wearable laser scanning (WLS) for individual tree modeling at plot level. Remote Sensing, 10(4), 540.
  4. Carla LAUTER’in 13 Mayıs 2020 tarihli yazısı (Yeni giyilebilir VLX tarayıcıları ile NavVis, mobil haritalamayı ana akım haline getirmeyi hedefliyor) www-geoweeknews-com. (son erişim 01.10.2021)
  5. Chio, S. H. & Hou, K. W. (2021). Application of a Hand-Held LiDAR Scanner for the Urban Cadastral Detail Survey in Digitized Cadastral Area of Taiwan Urban City. Remote Sensing, 13(24), 4981.
  6. Di Filippo, A., Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Barba, S., Martín-Jiménez, J. A., Mora, R. & González Aguilera, D. (2018). Use of a wearable mobile laser system in seamless indoor 3D mapping of a complex historical site. Remote Sensing, 10(12), 1897.
  7. Di Filippo, A., Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Barba, S., Martín-Jiménez, J. A., Mora, R. & González Aguilera, D. (2018). Use of a wearable mobile laser system in seamless indoor 3D mapping of a complex historical site. Remote Sensing, 10(12), 1897.
  8. Di Stefano, F., Chiappini, S., Gorreja, A., Balestra, M. & Pierdicca, R. (2021). Mobil 3D tarama LiDAR: bir literatür taraması. Geomatik, Doğal Tehlikeler ve Risk, 12 (1), 2387-2429.
  9. Di Stefano, F., Torresani, A., Farella, E. M., Pierdicca, R., Menna, F. & Remondino, F. (2021). 3D surveying of underground built heritage: Opportunities and challenges of mobile technologies. Sustainability, 13(23), 13289.
  10. Erdoğan, A., Kabadayi, A. & Akin, E. S. (2021). Kültürel mirasın fotogrametrik yöntemle 3B modellenmesi: Karabıyık Köprüsü Örneği. Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi, 3(1), 23-27.
  11. Geoslam firmasının ana sayfasından 14 Ekim 2021 tarihinde https://geoslam.com/, adresinden erişildi.
  12. GEXCEL Şirketinin sayfasından 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde https://gexcel.it/en/solutions/heron-portable-3d-mapping-system adresinden erişildi.
  13. Hyyppä, E., Kukko, A., Kaijaluoto, R., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A., Pyörälä, J. & Hyyppä, J. (2020). Accurate derivation of stem curve and volume using backpack mobile laser scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 161, 246-262.
  14. Kabadayı, A. & Uysal, M. (2020). Çok yüksek çözünürlüklü İHA verilerinden bina tespiti. Türkiye İnsansız Hava Araçları Dergisi, 2(2), 43-48.
  15. Kabadayı, A. (2021). Unmanned aerial vehicle usage in rough areas and photogrammetric data generation. Advanced UAV, 1(1), 8-14.
  16. Kanun, E., Metin, A. & Yakar, M. (2021). Yersel Lazer Tarama Tekniği Kullanarak Ağzıkara Han’ın 3 Boyutlu Nokta Bulutunun Elde Edilmesi. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3 (2), 58-64. DOI: 10.51946/melid.1025856
  17. Karabacak A. (Kasım 2022) Mobil Haritalama Yöntemlerinin Farkli Yerlerde Uygulamalari ve Karşilaşilan Sorunlar, Mersin Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Uzaktan Algilama Ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Anabilim Dalı, Yüksek Lisans Tezi,
  18. Karabacak, A. & Yakar, M. (2022) Giyilebilir Mobil LİDAR Kullanım Alanları ve Cambazlı Kilisesinin 3B Modellemesi. , 4(2), 37-52.
  19. Karataş, L., Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2022a). Determination of Stone Material Deteriorations on the Facades with the Combination of Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Methods: Case Study of Historical Burdur Station Premises. Advanced Geomatics, 2(2), 65-72.
  20. Karataş, L., Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2022b). Creating Architectural Surveys of Traditional Buildings with the Help of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Method (TLS) and Orthophotos: Historical Diyarbakır Sur Mansion. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 54-63.
  21. Karataş, L., Alptekin, A. & Yakar, M. (2022c). Analytical Documentation of Stone Material Deteriorations on Facades with Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Methods: Case Study of Şanlıurfa Kışla Mosque. Advanced LiDAR, 2(2), 36-47.
  22. Kaya, Y., Yiğit, A. Y., Ulvi, A. & Yakar, M. (2021). Arkeolojik alanların dokümantasyonununda fotogrametrik tekniklerinin doğruluklarının karşılaştırmalı analizi: Konya Yunuslar Örneği. Harita Dergisi, 165, 57-72.
  23. Ko, C., Lee, S., Yim, J., Kim, D. & Kang, J. (2021). Comparison of Forest Inventory Methods at Plot-Level between a Backpack Personal Laser Scanning (BPLS) and Conventional Equipment in Jeju Island, South Korea. Forests, 12(3), 308.
  24. LEICA firmasının ana sayfasından 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde https://leica-geosystems.com/products/mobile-sensor-platforms/capture-platforms/leica-pegasus-backpack adresinden erişildi.
  25. Maset, E., Cucchiaro, S., Cazorzi, F., Crosilla, F., Fusiello, A. & Beinat, A. (2021). Investigating the Performance of a Handheld Mobile Mapping System in Different Outdoor Scenarios. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 43, B1-2021.
  26. Maset, E., Scalera, L., Beinat, A., Visintini, D. & Gasparetto, A. (2022). Performance Investigation and Repeatability Assessment of a Mobile Robotic System for 3D Mapping. Robotics, 11(3), 54.
  27. Masiero, A., Fissore, F., Guarnieri, A., Pirotti, F., Visintini, D. & Vettore, A. (2018). Performance evaluation of two indoor mapping systems: Low-cost UWB-aided photogrammetry and backpack laser scanning. Applied Sciences, 8(3), 416.
  28. Oruç, M. E. & Baş, G. (2021). Kompleks Yapı ve Alanlarda Yersel Lazer Tarama Teknolojisinin Kullanımı. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3(2), 39-47.
  29. Oruç, M. E. & Öztürk, İ. L. (2021). Usability of Terrestrial Laser Technique in Forest Management Planning. Türkiye Lidar Dergisi, 3(1), 17-24.
  30. Otero, R., Lagüela, S., Garrido, I. & Arias, P. (2020). Mobile indoor mapping technologies: A review. Automation in Construction, 120, 103399.
  31. Paksoyteknik şirketinin sayfasından 17 Ekim 2022 tarihinde https://paksoyteknik.com.tr/index.php/paksoy-topcon/lazer-tarama/gexcel-heron adresinden erişildi.
  32. Rodríguez-Martín, M., Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Maté-González, M. Á., Muñoz-Nieto, Á. L. & Gonzalez-Aguilera, D. (2022). Comprehensive Generation of Historical Construction CAD Models from Data Provided by a Wearable Mobile Mapping System: A Case Study of the Church of Adanero (Ávila, Spain). Sensors, 22(8), 2922.
  33. Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., Mora, R., Conde, B., Maté-González, M. Á., Sánchez-Aparicio, M. & González-Aguilera, D. (2021). Integration of a wearable mobile mapping solution and advance numerical simulations for the structural analysis of historical constructions: A case of study in San Pedro Church (Palencia, Spain). Remote Sensing, 13(7), 1252.
  34. Şenol, H. I., Erdogan, S., Onal, M., Ulukavak, M., Memduhoglu, A., Mutlu, S. & Yilmaz, M. (2017). 3D Modeling of A Bazaar in Ancient Harran City Using Laser Scanning Technique. International Archives of The Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 42.
  35. Şenol, H. İ., Memduhoglu, A. & Ulukavak, M. (2020). Multi instrumental documentation and 3D modelling of an archaeological site: a case study in Kizilkoyun Necropolis Area. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi, 11(3), 1241-1250.
  36. Thomson C., (2020), (What is SLAM?) 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde https://info.vercator.com/blog/what-is-slam adresinden erişildi.
  37. Thomson C., (2021), 3 types of terrestrial laser scanners 2 Ekim 2021 tarihinde https://info.vercator.com/blog/3-types-of-terrestrial-laser-scanners adresinden erişildi.
  38. Ulvi A., Yiğit, A. Y., Çelik, M. Ö. & Alptekin, A. (2021). Detection of existing infrastructure lines with wearable laser scanners and making infrastructure map: a case of Mersin University. Mersin Photogrammetry Journal, 3(2), 61-68.
  39. Ulvi, A. & Yiğit, A. Y. (2022). Comparison of the Wearable Mobile Laser Scanner (WMLS) with Other Point Cloud Data Collection Methods in Cultural Heritage: A Case Study of Diokaisareia. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage, 15(4), 1-19.
  40. Ulvi, A., Yakar, M., Toprak, A. S. & Mutluoglu, O. (2015). Laser Scanning and Photogrammetric Evaluation of Uzuncaburç Monumental Entrance. International Journal of Applied Mathematics Electronics And Computers, 3 (1), 32-36. DOI: 10.18100/İjamec.41690
  41. Vassena, G. & Clerici, A. (2018). Open pit mine 3D mapping by tls and digital photogrammetry: 3D model update thanks to a slam based approach. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42(2), 1145-1148.
  42. Velas, M., Spanel, M., Sleziak, T., Habrovec, J. & Herout, A. (2019). Indoor and outdoor backpack mapping with calibrated pair of velodyne LiDARs. Sensors, 19(18), 3944.
  43. Xu, S., Sun, X., Yun, J. & Wang, H. (2020). A new clustering-based framework to the stem estimation and growth fitting of street trees from mobile laser scanning data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 13, 3240-3250.
  44. Yakar, M., Yılmaz, H. M. & Mutluoğlu, Ö. (2008). Lazer Tarama Teknolojisi ve Fotogrametrik Yöntem ile Hacim Hesabı. TÜBİTAK, Proje No: 105M179, 90s.
  45. Yakar, M., Yilmaz, H. M. & Mutluoglu, O. (2009). Comparative Evaluation of Excavation Volume by Terrestrial Laser Scanner and Total Topographic Station Based Methods. Lasers in Engineering, 19(5), 331.
  46. Yakar, M., Yılmaz, H. M. & Mutluoǧlu, Ö. (2010). Comparative evaluation of excavation volume by TLS and total topographic station based methods. Lasers in Engineering,19, 331–345
  47. Yılmaz, H. & Yakar, M. (2016). LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) Tarama Sistemi. Yapı Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi, 2 (2), 23-33.
  48. Zhou, S., Kang, F., Li, W., Kan, J., Zheng, Y. & He, G. (2019). Extracting diameter at breast height with a handheld mobile LiDAR system in an outdoor environment. Sensors, 19(14), 3212.